On eels + mash and contemporary dining culture

Eels and Mash

You say eels and mash, I ask if you’re ready for lunch. We better hurry because this once-ubiquitous meal is disappearing faster than you can say ‘coals and coke’.

It’s understandable. A monochrome plate of stewed eels and mashed potatoes swimming in parsley liquor the color of hospital walls can hardly compete with photos fluffy bagels oozing bright orange cheese. No, stewed eels just melt-in-your-mouth, leaving you with a thorny spine to dispose of. They taste of porridge overcooked in the microwave and cross lunch ladies and drafty boarding school canteens

Shops serving eels once dotted the streets in London’s cockney communities and offered a cheaper alternative to meat pie. The few that remain each present a distinct vision of the past. M. Manze in Southwark—a new location, the original is in Peckham—caters to gastro-tourists from nearby Borough and Maltby Markets. You order at the counter before lugging your plate to a distressed wood booth and perhaps buying a souvenir mug after you finish. It’s an Experience. You eat at Manzes to not-order from the old school menu and to admire the tiled walls and wood fixtures while chewing through your single-textured food. By denying the tropes and symbols of the contemporary dining experience, Manze’s defends tradition.

Other pie and mash shops twist their history to appeal to eaters looking for an affirming nostalgia. Stop by Goddard’s at Greenwich or G. Kelly and you’ll have to order eels as a side. This separation defines eels as a taste and pie as a food. By guiding the diner away from a meal entirely of eels and potatoes, the restaurants imply that eels are a product not fit for eating. Meat pies and potatoes are the foods that nourish us. These restaurants play the parent directing us to make smarter food choices—only in this case, the smart food choice is the modern one.

Although it’s unlikely that eels and mash will ever recapture its central point in the British diet, the dish’s changing fortunes offers valuable lessons about contemporary dining culture. Eels and mash remind us that society constructs our expectations of a meal. Marketers have taught us to demand certain textures, cookbook authors urge us to beg for diversity and restauranteurs push us to crave story-filled dining rooms. Eels and mash negate these forces. With a uniform texture, boring color and standard presentation, eels and mash defies our expectations. And we should keep eating them.

On Sunday mornings, melting butter, and Jean-etienne Liotard

Croissant feast at Almondine

I wish Sunday mornings still tasted of butter. As a kid, I anticipated its rich sweetness from the moment I woke up. To distract my impatient stomach while my parents slept in, I memorized the print of a Jean-Etienne Liotard painting that hung next to the TV. The sitter wore a dress made from a flower-printed fabric that I imagined felt as soft as a golden brown pancake. The kind that they served at IHOP, which didn’t exist in New York and which I begged my parents to let us visit when we went to see family. My dad made thick, dimpled pancakes but he dropped chocolate chips in if you asked. It was a consolation prize I readily accepted.

But he cooked pancakes only on special Sundays. Otherwise, he took me to the local bagel store before morning soccer games. This was Brooklyn so the line was long, but this was Brooklyn so the line moved quickly because Brooklynites are more familiar with their bagel orders than they are with maximizing vertical storage. The orders cascaded like couplets at a poetry recital. Sesame with cream cheese. Tuna salad on pumperknickel. Everything with lox. And plain, toasted with butter, for me. The bagel came wrapped in white parchment paper that felt as scratchy as my polyester soccer jersey. I didn’t know how to improve the jersey, but I did know how to fix the packaging: devour the gobs of melting butter and pretend like they made soccer interesting.

Giving up soccer solved the soccer conundrum and I moved from bagels and bodegas to toast and breakfast with my parents at a nearby Latin restaurant. Forget brittle slices tossed on a grubby plate. These grilled quadrilaterals of spongey loaf bread came sandwiched together in wicker baskets lined with burgundy paper napkins. They had less butter than bagels, but sometimes you’d pry apart two pieces and find piles hidden inside. Opening those pieces was more exciting than coming home to discover the book you’d ordered from Amazon had arrived.

Then the neighborhood changed, rents increased, and Duane Reade replaced the restaurant. Simultaneously, I realized croissants epitomized Sunday morning butter, though they needed help. Straight from the pastry case at our local café, they tasted like Halloween spider webbing. After being wrapped in foil and blitzed in the oven, the plasticine texture loosened into waves of silk. I rode these waves across the city. To my neighborhood’s newly-opened French bakery, to City Bakery’s Pretzel croissant and to Whole Foods for pain au chocolat. Whereas I had once craved the uniform surface of IHOP pancakes, I relished the variety of texture the croissant offered. From crunchy to chewy and soft, each bite reintroduced me to my long-time friend. Butter wasn’t just an ingredient, but an experience that changed according to circumstances.

I still love butter but eat less. Sometimes I bake it up as shortbread or use it to scramble an egg. But whenever I detect its sweet aroma—of cookies baking or pancakes sizzling—I remember those Sunday morning soccer games, crumbs, and that Liotard dress. And all is right with the world.